ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: On March 11, 2020, the WHO classified COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Measures to quell the pandemic included limiting non-essential activities including clinic visits and procedures. It is unclear if individuals with OI had disruptions in their access to healthcare or medications, and if such disruptions affected patients' symptoms. METHOD(S): A REDCap survey was distributed through the OI Foundation on August 31. Surveys completed through September 11 by individuals with OI or their caregiver are included in this analysis. Participants were asked to compare their symptoms and access to healthcare during the first 4 months of the pandemic to the 4 months before the pandemic. RESULT(S): 85 surveys were completed, and 6 were partially completed. The median age of participants was 40 years;35% were children. 32% of participants self-identified as having severe OI. Although most reported no changes in bone pain or fractures, 46% reported they were less likely to seek emergency medical care to treat a fracture, while 33% reported they were more likely to treat fractures at home (Fig 1A). There were delays in accessing all services, with greatest delays accessing dentistry (74%) and aquatic therapy (84%) (Fig 1B). 36% of participants receiving bisphosphonate infusions had delayed infusions because of the pandemic (Fig 1C). Of note, 50% of planned surgeries were delayed. CONCLUSION(S): Although many individuals with OI and their caregivers reported delays in accessing bone-related services/clinics during this 4-month period, there was not a concomitant increase in reported symptoms. This may have related to shelter-in-place restrictions and decreased activity. Limitations of this study include small sample size and potential selection bias because responses were obtained only from OIF members. To address these limitations, we are distributing the survey through healthcare providers of individuals with OI across major regions of the US from a variety of practice types including endocrine, orthopedics and multidisciplinary clinics. Furthermore, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we hope that this survey will provide information to address what aspects of healthcare may be in greatest need, as well as the modality through which services may be met. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Aim: People with type 1 or type 2 diabetes have a higher hospital admission rate following Covid-19 infection. This study aims to determine the degree to which the results of a previous study in Greater Manchester (GM) could be replicated in national-level data for England. Method(s): We focussed on the univariable regression analysis, which shows the association between admission and Covid-19 infection in people with diabetes. Modelling was conducted using logistic regression on data from the Covid-IMPACT database. Odds ratios were compared descriptively with the previous study. Result(s): In people with type 2 diabetes, factors associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation similar to the previous study were: older age, male sex, higher social deprivation, higher body mass index (BMI), higher cholesterol, lower eGFR, taking an ACE-inhibitor/ ARB, not taking metformin, and having asthma or hypertension. Patients with COPD, and those taking aspirin or clopidogrel also had increased risk, but the national data showed a greater risk (GM COPD odds ratio 1.89 [1.63-2.19] vs national 2.34 [2.28-2.40] / aspirin 1.49 [1.34-1.66] vs 1.66 [1.63-1.70] / clopidogrel 1.71 [1.47-1.98] vs 1.99 [1.94-2.04]). Similar results were observed in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, due to the increase in sample size, many factors which were previously not statistically significant have become significant, such as in type 2 diabetes BMI, low HDL-cholesterol. Conclusion(s): We have successfully replicated the methods, results and conclusions of our previous study in relation to factors associated with increased risk of hospital admission in diabetes individuals. Regional databases are suitable for large cohort studies, and in this instance produced similar results to a national database, validating our previous findings.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Automatic drug dispensers are now widely used in critical care.1-2 They can provide information about dispensed drugs. Good practice in sedation restricts the use of sedatives and titrates doses to defined responses.3-4 Objectives: To extract drug dispenser issuing records for sedatives and link these to patient records to evaluate sedative use. Method(s): in October 2019, we introduced two Omnicell XT automated dispensing cabinets (Omnicell inc. CA, USA) into a 42 bedded general/neurological unit. ICNARC (Intensive care national audit and research centre) and CCMDS (Critical care minimum data set) data was collected using the Ward Watcher program. Dispenser issuing records for alfentanil, propofol and midazolam were obtained as Excel files for 13 months from January 2020. Output time stamps were converted to dates and times. Outputs were linked to outputs of the ICNARC and CCMDS records for the patients that the drugs were issued to. All the outputs had patients identified by their unique hospital numbers. These were used in Excel "power queries" to produce a spread sheet with a single row per patient. Multiple admissions used the first diagnosis, the final outcome and the total length of stay. The total dose of sedatives was calculated from ampoule dose and number. The duration of treatment was calculated from the first and last issues of the drug. ICNARC codes were used to identify the primary system in the admission diagnostic code and those patients admitted for COVID-19. Variables were compared using Chi Squared, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis Tests. The significance of associations was established using Spearman's Rho. Linear regression was used to define relationships more clearly. Result(s): Table one summarises the patient characteristics with respect to all admissions during the study period and for patients who had had the studied drugs issued to them. Midazolam was used in fewer patients, they were more likely to be male, heavier (p>0001) and to die than patients receiving Propofol or Alfentanil (p>0.001). With respect to diagnostic groups, all the sedatives, particularly Midazolam (p<0.001), were more likely to be used in patients with COVID-19. The relationship between the dose of sedative drugs and patient age and weight was explored using the dose per advanced respiratory day. All three drugs had a significant but weak negative relationship with age, lower doses being given to older people (Propofol r2 = 0.02, p=0.01. Alfentanil r2 = 0.04, p=0.00. Midazolam r2 = 0.07, p=0.00.). There was also a weak but significant relationship between increasing dose of Propofol with patient weight (r2 = 0.02, p=0.01), but there was no relation between weight and doses of the other drugs. Conclusion(s): Information from automatic drug dispensers can be interpreted and combined with other datasets to produce clinically relevant information. The limited weak relationships between drug dose and age and weight suggests that sedative drugs could have been better titrated to response.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: While programmatic and institutional accreditation remain the vital components of a quality education, the associated costs of a site visit can be excessive, especially when the technology is available to accomplish this process virtually. In the wake of the COVID-19 global pandemic, it also became evident that a virtual site visit was the only viable means to accredit diagnostic medical sonography programs, given safety concerns for site visitors. Method(s): The study followed a mixed method, quasi-experimental design. This virtual site visits includes all learning concentrations (e.g. general sonography, adult cardiac sonography, and vascular technology) along with programs offering a multi-concentration educational program (i.e. combinations of any the listed learning concentrations). This research was based on the three quantitative questions and a fourth qualitative question. Result(s): The data analyses confirmed the McEwan and Walsh theory that the virtual accreditation site visit is a viable option given the many possibilities of communication technologies available today. This cost-saving alternative has the potential to reshape the rigorous accreditation process while saving educational institutions the expense of the on-site visit which was noted by the program directors. Conclusion(s): A future study of this kind could be enhanced by using a larger sample size than 28 programs that participated in this study. Take home message: In an era of cutting costs and maximising efficiency while still upholding the integrity of the programmatic accreditation, the virtual site visit does maintain the effectiveness and efficiency of the accrediting process.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 made many changes in life of persons and even after post COVID era these changes are integral to our life. Some of the changes were online classes, work from home, and online gaming. Computer work leads to static position of neck, shoulders, and upper limbs for extended hours. This leads to higher risk of developing visual, musculoskeletal and psychological problems. Aims and Objectives: The present study was carried out to determine prevalence of musculoskeletal health disorders, assess work distribution, and their probable interaction with musculoskeletal health problems in computer users of Ahmedabad city. Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional study was carried out over a period of 1-year time among 800 participants to study the musculoskeletal problems among computer users. Result(s): Out of 800 participants, 76.75% of participants had any computer related musculoskeletal problem. If participants work more than 4 h in a single spell prevalence of musculoskeletal problems was 82.95%. Regular exercise has significant role in preventing computer-related musculoskeletal problems. Conclusion(s): Computer-related musculoskeletal problems have relation with number of hours spent in single spell, total daily working hours, and years of computer-related work.Copyright © 2023, Mr Bhawani Singh. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Varenox is the first locally manufactured and approved biosimilar in Algeria. It is an enoxaparin sodium (ES) with established good analytical characterization and manufacturing quality control. The aim of the PROPHYVAR study was to generate real-life data in routine practices and to assess the safety and tolerability in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Method(s): This is an observational, prospective, multicenter study, conducted between April 2021 and May 2022. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to the study drug. A sample size of 500 patients was calculated to estimate the proportion of patients with AEs. Assuming that approximately 10% will be lost to follow-up or not evaluable, 550 patients were needed to describe the impact of Varenox use. Result(s): The study was conducted in 25 different sites in Algeria, in 4 therapeutic areas: ICU, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and nephrology;550 patients were included and received at least one injection of Varenox. The mean age was 47 years, women in majority (62.5%). The patients were overweight or obese (53%), with a history of arterial hypertension (25%), diabetes (7.5%) and renal failure (6.4%). Reasons for hospitalization were mainly fracture (15.5%), pregnancy (8.3%), COVID-19 (7%) or cancer (7%). The majority of patients were treated at prophylactic dose of 0.4ml (80%) or 0.6ml (10%). The median duration of follow-up was 24 days. A total of 38 patients experienced at least one AE (6.9%, CI95=[4.9%;9.4%]). Related AEs were reported in 10 patients (1.8%), mainly in nephrology (N=7 arterio-venous fistula). VTE events were reported in 6 patients (1.1%, CI95=[0.2%;2%]). Conclusion(s): This study suggests that Varenox is safe in the prophylaxis of VTE. To our knowledge this is the first large study describing the use of ES in current medical practice in Algeria.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes and risk factors associated with mortality of patients cannulated on ECMO in the context of covid infection during the pandemics in a newly implemented ECMO center Methods: This was a unicentric observational retrospective study performed at Real Hospital Portugues, in Recife, state of Pernambuco, Brazil. All consecutive patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection cannulated for VV-ECMO or VA-ECMO for severe ARDS from march 2020 to december 2021 were included retrospectively. Patients recieving ECMO for isolated refratory cardiogenic shock were excluded. Descriptive statistics and association tests were used to analyze characteristics, management and patient outcomes during that period. Result(s): In our cohort of 47 ECMO for covid associated ARDS (CARDS), 39 patients (83%) were admitted by our emergency department. 8 patients (17%) had been transferred from other hospitals as soons as they had been cannulated. 32 patients (68%) were male, median age was 50 years (18-69). Mean body mass index was 31 (21,4-46,3). 37 patients (78%) had at least 1 comorbidity. Major bleeding occurred in 34 (72%) patients. Venous thromboembolism and hemolysis ocurred in 19 (40%) and 13 (23%) patients, respectively. When we compared treatments before ECMO initiation (imunoglobulin, tocilizuman, nitric oxide, neuromuscular blockade and proning), proning was associated with better survival (RR 0,67 IC 0,46-0,97 p 0,029). The mean duration in mechanical ventilation until ECMO cannulation was 9,69 days and mean time in ECMO was 23 days. The 90- day mortality was approximately 72%. Conclusion(s): The only variable associated with a better chance of survival was proning before ECMO. Our mortality (72%) is higher than reported from a recent meta-analysis of 1986 ECMO patients implanted during the first pandemic year(37,1%). However it is similar to a German populational registry of covid patients receiving VV-ECMO (73%). Althought it;s impossible to make causal inferences with such a design and sample sizes, we believe that describing the experience of smaller and newly implemented ECMO centers serves as motivation to improve quality and also to plan for future episodes of pressure on health system.
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: One of the most remarkable features of SARS-CoV-2 infection is that a large proportion of individuals are asymptomatic while others experience progressive, even lifethreatening acute respiratory distress syndrome, and some suffer from prolonged symptoms (long COVID). The contribution of host genetics to susceptibility and severity of infectious disease is well-documented, and include rare monogenic inborn errors of immunity as well as common genetic variation. Studies on genetic risk factors for long COVID have not yet been published. Method(s): We compared long COVID (1534) to COVID-19 patients (96,692) and population controls (800,353) using both questionnaire and EHR- based studies. First meta-analysis of 11 GWAS studies from 8 countries did not show genome-wide significant associations. Result(s): Testing 24 variants earlier associated to COVID-19 susceptibility or severity by COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative showed genetic variation in rs505922, an intronic variant in ABO blood group gene, to be associated with long COVID compared to population controls (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07-1.27, p = 0.033). (Within-COVID analysis gave similar OR, but was not significant after conservative Bonferroni correction (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.30, p = 092)). Conclusion(s): The first data freeze of the Long COVID Host Genetics Initiative suggests that the O blood group is associated with a 14% reduced risk for long COVID. The following data freezes with growing sample sizes will possibly elucidate long COVID pathophysiology and pave the way for possible treatments for long lasting COVID symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate adverse effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (COVAXIN) in a pregnant woman with that of a nonpregnant woman. Material(s) and Method(s): It is a prospective observational study done at Vanivilas Hospital, Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute (BMCRI) for 2 months. The sample size was 100 pregnant and 100 nonpregnant women. Telephonically, patients were followed-up, and details of the side/adverse effects were collected in a proforma after 2 and 14 days. Data collected from both groups were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Result(s): The majority of women were in the age group of <=25 years (64.0% and 36.0%, respectively) with a mean age of 25.01 +/- 3.71 years among the pregnant and 28.52 +/- 6.00 years among nonpregnant women. About 25.0% of pregnant women and 38.0% of nonpregnant women reported side effects. About 15.0% and 22.0% had taken treatment for side effects among pregnant women and nonpregnant women, respectively. Among the pregnant women, the common side effects reported were injection site pain (17) followed by fever (5), fatigue (4), and myalgia (03). Whereas among the nonpregnant women, the common side effects reported were injection site pain (28) followed by fever (6), myalgia (3), headache (2), and fatigue (1). Conclusion(s): Side effects reported following the administration of Covaxin in pregnant and nonpregnant women are fever, fatigue, injection site pain, myalgia, and headache. The proportion of side effects was not significantly different in the pregnant and nonpregnant women following Covaxin administration. Clinical significance: Covaxin is an inactivated killed vaccine against COVID-19 by Bharat Biotech. The vaccine has been recommended for pregnant women by the Government of India during corona pandemic. Studies are lacking regarding the difference in adverse events in pregnant versus nonpregnant women, after vaccine administration.Copyright © The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
There is limited information on the effects of COVID-19 early in pregnancy on the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs). Initial research has been limited by small samples, lack of attention to the timing of infection during pregnancy, lack of an appropriate control group, and biased selection of participants. The International Registry of Coronavirus Exposure in Pregnancy (IRCEP) was designed to estimate the relative risk of adverse perinatal outcomes among women with COVID-19 at specific times during gestation. Adult women were eligible to enroll if they had a SARS-CoV-2 test, regardless of the results, or clinically confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy. Self-administered questionnaires collected data on the infection, pregnancy outcomes, and potential confounders. The analysis of MCMs included women with either a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test or a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 during the first trimester (exposed group) or a negative SARS-CoV-2 test (reference) that enrolled while pregnant. Of 17,163 participants enrolled between June 2020 and July 2021, 1,727 had a SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first trimester and 10,235 had a negative test during pregnancy. Restriction to participants with complete follow-up reduced the sample size to 92 exposed and 292 unexposed reference pregnancies. MCMs were reported in three (3.3%) exposed and eight (2.7%) unexposed (RR 1.2;95% CI 0.32-4.2) newborns. No specific pattern of malformations was observed. The accumulated evidence is most compatible with no major teratogenic effects associated with maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multiple biases need to be considered and addressed when estimating and interpreting the effects of COVID-19 early in pregnancy. The biggest methodological challenges for IRCEP were retention of participants enrolled in early pregnancy, and the potential bias introduced when participants enroll after pregnancy outcomes are known. Studies that allow enrollment after the outcome is known may select pregnancies with the outcome;those that exclude them would select survivors.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of ECMO in pediatric COVID-19 patients in terms of mortality rate, rate of successful weaning, and frequency of complications. Method(s): A comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to December 2022. Inclusion criteria for the studies included observational studies and case series with a minimum of five patients that reported on the use of ECMO in children with COVID-19. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): Seven studies involving a total of 73 pediatric COVID-19 patients who received ECMO were identified. The pooled estimate of mortality in children receiving ECMO was 21.5% (15 out of 73 patients;95% CI: 9.9% to 40.5%;I2 = 14%). The success rate for weaning off/decannulation of ECMO was estimated to be 85.1% (52 out of 61 patients;95% CI, 67.8-93.9;I2 = 1%). The overall complication rate was 32.6% (14 out of 43;95% CI, 20.3-47.7;I2 = 0%). Conclusion(s): The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that ECMO may be an effective treatment option for children with severe COVID-19, particularly those requiring mechanical ventilation. The success rate for weaning off/decannulation of ECMO was estimated to be 85.1%, while the overall complication rate was 32.6%. However, the small sample size and high risk of bias in the included studies should be taken into consideration when interpreting these results. Further research is necessary to confirm the efficacy of ECMO in pediatric COVID-19 patients and determine the optimal use of this treatment.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Preliminary data indicate that pregnant women infected with COVID-19 are at increased risk of pregnancy complications (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, October 2022). Information on the real-world safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy is essential. We sought to describe preliminary results for pregnancy status among pregnancy registry participants enrolled in an ongoing safety study of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to date. Method(s): This study uses data from the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS) Pregnancy Registry as part of the Vaccines and Medications in Pregnancy Surveillance System (VAMPSS) which enrolls pregnant women residing in the US or Canada. Data are captured through maternal interviews and the ion of medical records. The study population for this descriptive analysis includes Registry participants who met eligibility criteria on or after December 11, 2020, the date the US Food and Drug Administration granted emergency-use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The target sample size is 1,100 pregnant women who received any dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine from 30 days prior to the last menstrual period through the end of pregnancy, and 900 comparison women who received no COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy. Result(s): Among pregnant women participating in the Registry between 11 December 2020 and 22 July 2022, 1,100/1,100 participants (100.0% of the target sample) were enrolled as part of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine exposure cohort, and 635/900 participants (70.6% of the target sample) were enrolled in the comparator cohort. As of 22 July 2022, 858 (78.0%) in the vaccine exposure cohort and 313 (34.8%) in the comparator cohort had completed pregnancies. Descriptive data indicated numerically similar percentages of pregnancies ending in at least one liveborn infant, spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, and elective terminations across the exposed cohort stratified by trimester of the earliest dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine received in pregnancy, and overall in the unexposed comparator cohort. Conclusion(s): Preliminary data have not identified any new safety concerns thus far for pregnant women who receive the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Funding(s): This study was conducted as a collaboration between the University of California San Diego and Pfizer. Pfizer is the study sponsor.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Voxelotor is a first-in- class sickle haemoglobin polymerisation inhibitor that targets the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD). Studies have shown that voxelotor increases haemoglobin and reduces markers of haemolysis. Emerging evidence suggests that voxelotor may improve the clinical symptoms of SCD, lower vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) rates, and reduce transfusion needs. Objective(s): To examine the real-world impact of voxelotor on transfusion, VOC, and hospitalisation rates among patients with SCD. Method(s): Medical and pharmacy claims data for patients >=4 years with SCD who started voxelotor between November 2019 and March 2022 were obtained from the Symphony Health database. Patients with >=1 year of data before the index date (date of first voxelotor claim) were included. Annualised study outcomes were calculated for patients with >=1 occurrence of the corresponding event in the 3-month preindex period. Outcomes from a 90-day lookback were reported for the total and paediatric (aged 4 to <18 years) populations. Result(s): Of 4023 eligible patients from the Symphony Health database included in the analysis, 596 were <18 years. Compared with the 3-month preindex period, significantly lower annualised rates of transfusions, VOCs, and hospitalizations, and lower annualised mean number of inpatient days, were observed in the total population and paediatric subgroup over the 3-month postindex period. For the total population, the annualised event rates declined by 50.6% for transfusions (n = 248), 23.1% for VOCs (n = 1368), 35.5% for VOC-related hospitalizations (n = 757), and 39.4% for all-cause hospitalizations (n = 928). The annualised mean number of inpatient days declined by 29.6% for VOC-related hospitalizations (n = 757) and by 22.9% for all-cause hospitalizations (n = 928). For paediatric patients, the annualised event rates declined by 79.6% for transfusions (n = 18), 42.4% for VOCs (n = 157), 56.8% for VOC-related hospitalizations (n = 81), and 51.5% for all-cause hospitalizations (n = 106). The annualised mean number of inpatient days declined by 54.1% for VOC-related hospitalizations (n = 81) and by 45.8% for all-cause hospitalizations (n = 106). Conclusion(s): Treatment with voxelotor may provide a clinical benefit to patients with SCD by reducing the frequencies of transfusions, VOCs, and hospitalizations and decreasing inpatient days. Greater reductions were observed in the paediatric subgroup, potentially due to the smaller sample size, historically greater treatment compliance in paediatric patients, or younger patients having accumulated fewer SCD-related complications, enabling a greater clinical response. Limitations include the study's non-randomized design, reliance on claims data, and changes in healthcare use during the COVID-19 pandemic confounding the data.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing UK sonographers' practice of adult bowel ultrasound. A mixed-method online questionnaire was designed and shared on social media platforms in April 2021. Research restrictions due to COVID19 limited the sample size permitted. Convenience sampling recruited thirty UK sonographers performing adult abdominal ultrasound in their practice. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Quantitative data revealed that 53% (n= 16) of the participants expressed a lack of confidence in scanning the bowel, while 77%, (n = 23) indicated a high level of interest in training in bowel ultrasound. Although 63.3% (n = 19) of the participants reported a high level of confidence in scanning the bowel for suspected appendicitis, the majority (70%, n = 21) expressed lack of confidence in examining the bowel for other pathologies like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inductive thematic analysis of qualitative data revealed that the participants had varying opinions on this topic. Emerging themes included training opportunities, preference of other imaging modalities, management challenges, sonographers, and radiologists' influence. Qualitative results suggested that factors influencing sonographer evaluation of the bowel include advanced levels of training, a high degree of support from radiologists, regular bowel ultrasound lists, audits, and feedback from clinicians. Based on the findings of this study, most sonographers are not confident in practising bowel ultrasound beyond the evaluation of suspected appendicitis. Surveyed sonographers were interested in expanding their roles into other areas of bowel ultrasound like examining for Crohn's and ulcerative colitis. Sonographer role extension into this area of practice is limited by various factors like chronic shortage of sonographers, increasing workload, limited training, and the perception of diminishing support from radiologists. We recommend a future study that is not limited by a small sample size.
ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine the effect of COVID-19 on eye sight due to increase screen time in undergraduate students of medical school. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Place and duration of study: This survey was carried out from October 2022 to December 2022 in Army Medical College Rawalpindi. Questionnaires were filled in person and also online-based platform was used to distribute the e-questionnaire, developed using the Google Form. The participants were asked to share the e-questionnaire with their friends using Facebook and Messenger. Method(s): Participants were selected for the study using non-probability consecutive sampling. College students of 20-25 years were included in the study. Sample size was 400 according to a study done internationally. Participants with comorbidities (cataract, glaucoma) were excluded from study. Participants having (trouble concentrating on things such as reading the newspaper, books or watching television) were included in the study. Digital eye strain was calculated using validated computer vision syndrome (CVS-Q) questionnaire to measure the symptoms such as eye fatigue, headache, blurred vision, double vision, itching eyes, dryness, tears, eye redness and pain, excessive blinking, feeling of a foreign body, burning or irritation, difficulty in focusing for near vision, feeling of sight worsening, and sensitivity to light. Qualitative data was analyzed using Chi square test. Results A total number of 470 responses were recorded, out of which 257 (54.7%) were males and 213(45.3%) were females. In our study, the most common symptom was headache, affecting 58.1% of the population before COVID 19 which has increased to 83.2% and the P value is less than 0.001.Theother symptoms which also showed P value less than 0.001 were blurred vision while using digital device, irritated or burning eyes, dry eyes and sensitivity to bright light. Conclusion The practical implication of the study is to create awareness among general population about COVID, that eye sight is Bull`s Target to be affected by it and simple preventing measures can be taken. The purpose of this study is to limelight the importance that during COVID 19 lockdown the excessive use of digital devices and their cons on the ocular health among future health care workers.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aims: Peers4Rs (Remembering Resilience, Respect and Recovery) was established within the Early Psychosis Intervention Programme (EPIP) in 2010 to promote client advocacy and recovery. Despite recommendations for peer support in early intervention services, there is a general lack of research on its impact. Current research evaluating peer support are heterogeneous in relation to interventions and outcomes, limiting research quality. This exploratory study aims to evaluate oneto- one peer support intervention on recovery processes in people with early psychosis in Singapore, during the COVID-19 period. Method(s): Data from 26 clients with first-episode psychosis (FEP), aged between 15 and 44 years, who were accepted into the service between 2021 and 2022, was included in the analysis. One-to-one peer support intervention was delivered over phone/video call or inperson by certified Peer Support Specialists (PSSs). The 22-item selfreport Process of Recovery Questionnaire (QPR) was administered at pre- and post-intervention. Paired-sample t-test was run. Result(s): Pre- and post- scores were compared before and after completing the one-to-one peer support intervention. On average, post scores (M = 62.77, SD = 7.60) were higher than pre scores (M = 49.31, SD = 12.07). This improvement, 13.46, 95% CI [9.26, 17.67], was statistically significant, t (25) = 6.59, p < .001, Cohen's d = 1.34. Conclusion(s): Based on preliminary results, clients with FEP grew in their recovery process through the one-to-one peer support intervention in EPIP. This finding is promising, given small sample sizes and limits in mode of contact during the pandemic, lending support to further discussions.
ABSTRACT
Background: Recently, many biomarkers have been studied to determine severe cases of COVID-19. C-reactive protein (CRP) has shown high sensitivity in identifying patients with severe disease and utility comparable to computed tomography. Aim(s): To determine the usefulness of CRP to predict the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients hospitalized at the Naval Medical Center of Peru during the period January-September in the year 2021. Method(s): A quantita-tive, observational, analytical, retrospective, and diagnostic test type design was used. A sample size of 503 patients was calculated, which were divided into two groups according to their severity. Result(s): An optimal cut-off point of 10.92 mg/L for CRP levels was determined for the diagnosis of severe COVID-19. An area under the curve (AUC) of 0.762 was calculated and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy values of 78.88%, 66.4%;41.42%;87.01%;and 67.27%;respectively. Fagan's normogram showed a post-test probability of 41%. In the adjusted model, CRP (aOR = 4.853;95% CI 2.987-7.886;p = 0.001), ferritin (aOR = 1.001;95% CI: 1.001-1.002;p = 0.001) and hypothyroidism (adjusted OR = 4899;95% CI: 1272-18872;p = 0.021) showed significance. Conclusion(s): The present study showed an association between CRP and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in an adjusted model, showing its potential utility and contributing to determine the cut-off point of CRP in the Peruvian population and its international comparison.Copyright © 2023, Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Non-inferiority vaccine trials compare new candidates to active controls that provide clinically significant protection against a disease. Bayesian statistics allows to exploit pre-experimental information available from previous studies to increase precision and reduce costs. Here, historical knowledge is incorporated into the analysis through a power prior that dynamically regulates the degree of information-borrowing. We examine non-inferiority tests based on credible intervals for the unknown effects-difference between two vaccines on the log odds ratio scale, with an application to new Covid-19 vaccines. We explore the frequentist properties of the method and we address the sample size determination problem.
ABSTRACT
The high cost of living and prolonged lockdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic made the financial well-being of individuals vulnerable, especially young adults. This paper examines the impact of financial behaviour on financial well-being (FWB) among young Malaysians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study collected variable data on financial literacy, financial behaviour, financial socialisation, self-control, financial technology and FWB. To collect a representative sample of Malaysian young adults, a multi-stage random sampling method was used, and 360 young adults aged 18-29 years old completed the questionnaires. Structural equation modelling was adopted to investigate the factors influencing young adults' FWB. The empirical findings revealed a significant mediating effect of financial behaviour in the relationships between financial literacy, financial socialisation, self-control, financial technology, and FWB. The research concluded that the mediation analysis yields a clear and firm conclusion that financial behaviour is important in empowering young adults' FWB. Thus, the present study adds value to the existing literature on the relationship between financial behaviour and FWB. Furthermore, the paper's findings will assist government agencies and non-governmental organisations in developing outreach programmes for young adults per the strategies outlined in the Twelfth Malaysia Plan and the aspirations pledged in the Malaysian Youth Policy 2015-2035.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Few studies evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of different COVID-19 vaccine platforms in patients with primary Sjogren's Syndrome (pSS). The present study aims to assess the immunogenicity through anti-spike IgG antibodies after the COVID-19 vaccine dose in heterologous groups compared to homologous regimen in patients with pSS. Method(s): These data are from the SAFER study: 'Safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in rheumatic disease', a real-life phase IV multicenter longitudinal study, evaluating patients since before the first dose. Pregnant women, those with a history of serious adverse events prior to any vaccine, and those with other causes of immunosuppression were excluded. Patients with pSS > 18 years, classified according to ACR/EULAR 2016 classification criteria were included. Antibodies against the Receptor Binding Domain - RBD portion of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (IgG-S) were measured by chemiluminescence (Architect SARS-CoV-2 Quanti II, Abbott), before the first dose and 28 days after the 2nd and 3rd dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG-Spike titers >=7.1 BAU/mL. Patients received adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1, Astrazeneca), mRNA (Pfizer) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 (Coronavac). Non-parametric methods were used. The alpha level of significance was set at 5%. Result(s): 56 participants received 3 doses, 46 +/- 11 years old, disease duration 7.62 years, 92.9% female, 41.1% White and 55.4% Mixed. The homologous third-booster dose group (n = 15, all ChAdOx1) and heterologous group (n = 41) were homogeneous for age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, medication and baseline IgG-S median [IQR] titers. After primary vaccination (2 doses) IgG-S median and titers [IQR] were similar in homologous and heterologous groups (373.03 [179.58, 843.92] vs. 473.36 [119.05, 1059.60], p = 0.705). Third-booster dose induced higher IgG-S median [IQR] titers compared to only 2 doses (1229.54 [333.55, 4365.47] vs 464.95 [140.42, 1015.25], p alpha 0.001). Heterologous 3rd-booster induced higher IgG-S median [IQR] titers than homologous scheme with ChAdOx1 (1779.52 [335.83, 4523.89] vs 730.76 [303.37, 1858.98], p = 0.150), Fig 1 and 2, although not statistically significant. Conclusion(s): Third booster dose induced higher humoral immune response compared to two doses whichmay improve protection against COVID-19 in patients with pSS. Although not statistically significant, the response to the heterologous scheme tended to be better than the response to the homologous booster vaccination, which heterologous booster scheme tended to respond better than homologous booster vaccination, which is relevant in this immunosuppressed population. Increasing the sample size will help clarify this issue. .